BILL SUMMARY DETAILS

Florida League of Cities

  • Home-Based Businesses (Oppose – Preemption)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    CS/HB 537 (Donalds) and SB 778 (Perry) define a "home-based business" and preempt local governments from licensing and regulating home-based businesses. Local governments would be prohibited from enacting or enforcing any ordinance, regulation or policy regarding home-based businesses. However, such home-based businesses could not substantially increase traffic, noise, waste or recycling.  CS/HB 537 was amended to specify that a home-based business may not be regulated or licensed in a manner that is different from other businesses within a local government's jurisdiction. The bill now allows a party to challenge any local government action that violates the preemption. The prevailing party is entitled to recover attorney's fees and costs. (Cruz)

  • Recreational Vehicle Parks (Oppose – Preemption)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    SB 772 (Hutson) and CS/HB 647 (Drake) preempt local government regulations to allow any recreational vehicle park that is damaged or destroyed as a result of wind, water or other natural disaster to be rebuilt on the same site using the same density standards that were approved or permitted before the park was damaged or destroyed. (Cruz)

  • Growth Management (Oppose – Unfunded Mandate)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    CS/SB 410 (Perry) and CS/HB 203 (McClain) would require local governments to adopt by July 1, 2023, a new mandatory element in their comprehensive plans that addresses the protection of private property rights. CS/SB 410 was amended to require the Department of Economic Opportunity to give funding preference for technical assistance to certain counties and municipalities. CS/HB 203 now provides that a municipality may not annex an area within another municipal jurisdiction without consent from the other municipality. The amended bill also provides that a Development Regional Impact may be amended by the development order process, allowing a change in land use if the change does not increase impact to public facilities.  (Cruz)

  • Private Property Rights (Oppose)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    CS/HB 519 (Grant, J.) and CS/SB 1766 (Lee) open the door for an explosion of potential lawsuits against cities by making one-sided changes to the Bert J. Harris Act and leaving taxpayers to pay the price. The Harris Act gives landowners a way to seek compensation when a local government takes action that impacts the use/potential use of their property. The Harris Act is detailed and fair. It allows local governments to negotiate with property owners who are filing a claim and calls on courts to consider the unique conditions of each claim.

    The bills require any settlement reached on a Bert Harris claim to be automatically applied by the government entity to all "similarly situated" residential properties that are subject to the same rules or regulations. In essence, this provision would undo legislative action a government entity undertakes by requiring a settlement on one case to be applied across the board, turning Harris Act settlements into quasi class-action lawsuits. The bills do not define what a similarly situated property is, which opens the door for more litigation. The bills significantly amend the attorney fee provisions of the Harris Act, allowing only property owners to recover costs if they prevail. Additionally, the legislation would now include business losses as part of a Bert Harris claim. The Florida League of Cities opposes making one-sided changes to the Harris Act that only benefit attorneys and leaves taxpayers footing the bill.

    CS/HB 519 was amended in the House Civil Justice Committee to provide an additional avenue for resolving disputes concerning comprehensive plan amendments. The amendment allows comprehensive plan amendment challenges initiated by citizens to now follow the dispute process from the Florida Land Use and Environmental Dispute Resolution Act.

    CS/SB 1766 was substantially amended in the Senate Judiciary Committee. The Senate bill no longer contains the similarly situated concept. It no longer has any provisions affecting how attorney fees are determined, nor does it open the door to include business damages as part of any Harris claim. Currently, the Senate bill reduces the presuit timeframe to respond to claims from 150 days to 90 days and a provision that address the “ripeness” of claims by allowing a property owner to bring a claim prior to being officially denied a permit. (Cruz)

  • Constitutional Amendments Proposed by Initiative (Watch)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    HB 7037 (Judiciary Committee) and SB 1794 (Rader) strengthen the requirements and processes for amending the Florida constitution by petition. The legislation creates additional requirements for petition circulators and political action committees that back petitions. The bills increase the number of signatures that must be gathered from 10% to 50% before the secretary of state refers the petition to the attorney general. (Cruz)

  • Legislation by Initiative (Watch)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    HB 545 (Geller) and SB 1452 (Torres) create the right for citizens to propose legislation by ballot initiative. The bills define the process by which proposed legislation by ballot initiative would need to abide by, as well as the criteria that said legislation must comply with. The bills also set forth the process by which laws adopted by citizen initiative could be changed or repealed. The bills provide exceptions for types of proposed legislation if said legislation is proposed by legislative initiative. Of interest to cities: laws that change the boundaries of any municipality, county or special legislative or congressional district may not be proposed by initiative. (Cruz)

  • Legislative Preemption (Support)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    SB 1674 (Farmer) provides that the legislature may not preempt to the state a field of regulation or other subject of legislation unless it is passed by a two-thirds vote of each house. The bill also requires a supermajority vote of each house for a general law that preempts a subject of legislation to the state. (Cruz)

  • Dissolution of Municipalities (Oppose)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    SB 1522 (Broxson) and CS/HB 1209 (Fischer) expand the instances whereby voters can vote to dissolve a municipality. Under the bills, a municipality can be dissolved by a referendum by a majority vote of qualified voters. The referendum must be held if a municipality meets one or more of the following criteria: the municipality has been in a state of financial emergency for two years or more, a financial emergency board has been established in response to a financial emergency and the municipality has failed to comply with the terms included in a signed agreement with the Governor's office, the municipality has submitted its annual financial report or annual financial audit report significantly late for two or more years consecutively or a grand jury or auditor general audit report issued within the past three years identifies significant problems with the municipality.

    Within 30 days after one of the above criteria are met, the governing body of the municipality or, in the event the municipal government does not act, the governing body of the county or counties that the municipality is in, shall set the date of the referendum to dissolve the municipality. The referendum shall be at the next regularly scheduled election or a special election can be called. The election shall be noticed at least once a week for two weeks before the election in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality. (Cruz)

  • Other Bills of Interest

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    HB 173 (Polo) – Nonenforcement of Immigration Detainers and Nonjudicial Immigration Warrants

  • Federal Immigration Enforcement (Watch)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    HB 6023 (Polo) would repeal legislation from the 2019 Session relating to state and local government enforcement of federal immigration laws. (Cruz)

  • Other Bills of Interest 

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    SB 1466 (Baxley) and HB 855 (Payne) – Special Districts 

    SB 856 (Pizzo) and HB 1459 (Silvers) – Affordable Housing Tax Reduction

    SB 1434 (Torres) and HB 493 (Cortes) – Community Development Districts

    HB 163 (Altman) and SB 68 (Book) - Homelessness

  • Assisted and Independent Living Facility Task Force (Support)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    CS/SB 364 (Rader) and CS/CS/CS/HB 39 (Gottlieb) create the Assisted and Independent Living Facility Task Force within the Agency for Person with Disabilities. The task force must develop and evaluate policy proposals that incentivize developers or contractors to dedicate space for assisted living facilities or independent living facilities within mixed-use developments to house individuals with an intellectual disability, autism or mental illness. The task force membership includes a representative from the Florida League of Cities. (Branch)

  • State Housing Trust Fund (Support)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    SB 306 (Mayfield) and HB 381 (Silvers) specify that funds deposited in the State Housing Trust Fund and the Local Government Housing Trust Fund may not be transferred or used for any other purpose. (Branch)

  • Housing (Oppose – Preemption)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    CS/SB 998 (Hutson) and CS/HB 1339 (Yarborough) makes varied and comprehensive changes to Florida law that impact affordable housing.

    Of concern to municipalities, the bills:

    •require local governments to allow Accessory Dwelling Units in all single-family residential zones. 

    •permit a mobile home park damaged or destroyed by wind, water or other natural force to be rebuilt on the same site with the same density as was approved, permitted or built before being damaged or destroyed. (Branch)

  • Other Bills of Interest 

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    SB 54 (Book) and HB 87 (Mercado) – Sales Tax Exemption: Diapers and Incontinence Products 

    HB 93 (Casello) and SB 192 (Berman) – Sales Tax Exemption: Assist Living Facilities

    SJR 282 (Diaz) – Constitutional Amendment: Homestead Assessment Limitation for Certain Persons 

    SB 284 (Diaz) – Implementation Bill: Homestead Assessments for Certain Persons

    SB 296 (Albritton) – Property Assessment Administration 

    HB 429 (Valdes) and SB 508 (Baxley) – Sales Tax Absorption 

    SB 524 (Gruters) – Sales Tax Holiday for Disaster Preparedness Supplies

    HB 527 (Hill) – Sales Tax Exemption: Industrial Machinery and Equipment

    SB 542 (Perry) – Back-to-school Sales Tax Holiday

    SJR 396 (Rodriguez) – Single Subject Limitation for Taxation and Budget Reform Commission

    HB 555 (Aloupis) and SB 844 (Taddeo) – Sales Tax Exemption for Hurricane Shutters and Impact-resistant Windows

    SB 654 (Lee) – Sales Tax Refund for Eligible Job Training Organizations

    HB 1077 (LaMarca) and SB 1404 (Perry) – Department of Financial Services

    SB 1052 (Taddeo) – Small Business Saturday Sales Tax Holiday

    HB 1141 (Caruso) and SB 1778 (Gruters) – Taxation of Real Property

    HB 1249 (Sullivan) and SB 1662 (Albritton) – Transfer of Tax Exemption for Veterans

    SB 1310 (Mayfield) – Hunting and Fishing Sales Tax Holiday

    HB 811 (Geller) and SB 1306 (Thurston) – Transfers in Divorce

    SB 2500 (Appropriations Committee) and HB 5001 (Appropriations) – General Appropriations Act

    SB 2502 (Appropriations) HB 5003 (Appropriations) – Implementing the 2020-2021 General Appropriations Act

    HB 919 (Caruso) – Property Tax Exemptions Used by Hospitals

  • Information About Municipalities and Counties (Watch)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    SJR 1502 (Diaz) and HB 7061 (State Affairs Committee) propose an amendment to the Florida Constitution requiring Florida’s chief financial officer to annually provide information about counties and municipalities to residents in a manner that allows residents to compare economic and noneconomic factors of each local government. (Hughes)

  • Municipal Service Taxing Units and Municipal Service Benefit Units (Watch)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    SB 1330 (Gruters) require that establishment, merger, or abolishment of a municipal service taxing (MSTU) or municipal service benefit unit (MSBU) be approved by majority vote of certain qualified electors who would be or are subject to any service charge, special assessment, or tax within the unit in an election that is called for such purpose by the governing body of the county. The boundaries of an MSTU or MSBU may include all or part of the boundaries of a municipality if, in addition to the majority approval of qualified electors, consent by ordinance of the governing body of the affected municipality is given either annually or for a term of years. This bill provides procedures for the dissolution of an MSTU or MSBU that is created after July 1, 2020 and does not achieve the majority vote of qualified electors. (Hughes)

  • Homestead Exemptions (Watch)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    HB 6079 (Mariano) deletes gross income requirements for a totally and permanently disabled person to qualify for specified homestead exemptions. (Hughes)

  • Special Election (Watch)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    HB 881 (Killebrew) and CS/SB 1078 (Wright) provide for a special election to be held on Tuesday, August 18, 2020, to approve or reject HJR 877 (Killebrew), SJR 1076 (Wright) or a similar joint resolution having substantially the same specific intent and purpose. (Hughes)

  • Implementing Bill: Surviving Spouse Ad Valorem Tax Reduction (Watch)

    by Mary Edenfield | Feb 14, 2020

    HB 879 (Killebrew) and CS/SB 1074 (Wright) implement HJR 877, SJR 1076 or similar joint resolution if approved by the voters. (Hughes)